Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-06-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hello James, This is a really late answer but I was sick on Saturday and decided to let the computer switched off on Sunday... On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 09:58:59PM +0100, James Troup wrote: First of all: I am sorry for my previous mails on this thread. I really sounded like an idiot in those mail

Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-05-30 Thread Christian Kurz
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 07:34:57PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > > > Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new > > > release to fix this bug? Have you asked him, why he did

Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-05-29 Thread Christian Kurz
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 07:34:57PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new > > release to fix this bug? Have you asked him, why he didn't applied your > > patch? > I asked him on irc. H

Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-05-29 Thread James Troup
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 07:34:57PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new > > release to fix this bug? Have you asked him, why he didn't applied your > > patch? > > I asked him on ir

Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-05-29 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 07:34:57PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new > release to fix this bug? Have you asked him, why he didn't applied your > patch? I asked him on irc. He told me he would look at it at the weekend (that was 3 m

Re: QA more visible to users...

1999-05-29 Thread Christian Kurz
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I again worked on some minor quirks (currently working on a patch) and > noticed that my patch against mawk still did not make it into the package. I Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new release to fix this bug? H