RE: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread arto . astala
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, July 06, 1999 11:31 AM > On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 11:28:01AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If the package is maintained by QA, then it should be a > > maintainer upload, I presume. > > Then the bugs would get closed. > > > > Am I missing something obvio

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:28:48PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff écrivait: > Who is maintaining dinstall? It's just crazy that it does not notice this > package being maintained by the QA team - I think it should close bugs of > packages maintained by debian-qa. It's one of the ftpmasters, Guy Maor.

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 11:28:01AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > That would be nice, but is it worth the effort to make an exception? > > If the package is maintained by QA, then it should be a > maintainer upload, I presume. > Then the bugs would get closed. > > Am I missing something obvi

RE: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread arto . astala
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, July 06, 1999 9:23 AM > On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:28:48PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > > > It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed > > > comes from the > > >

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:28:48PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed comes from the > > automatic job that dinstall does. It has detected that it was a NMU so it > >

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-06 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed comes from the > automatic job that dinstall does. It has detected that it was a NMU so it > changed the severity instead of closing it. :-) Who is maintaining dinstall?

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 08:22:11PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt écrivait: > Since this package is owned by debian-qa why not close the bug, rather > than just setting it to be fixed? It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed comes from the automatic job that dinstall does. It has detected

Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU libapache-asp-perl 0.11-2

1999-07-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > severity 39976 fixed > Bug#39976: libapache-asp-perl places files in arch-specific manner > Severity set to `fixed'. Since this package is owned by debian-qa why not clos