Re: Problems

2021-01-03 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! These are end-user questions, and this is a developer list (this one in particular is about neglected packages and detecting neglect). It would be nice if, in the future, you asked on debian-user@ or similar places. Both of your questions are specific to a particular desktop environment (Gnom

Re: Problems in blends importers (Was: The certificate of 'ftp-master.debian.org' is not trusted.)

2015-08-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:51:44AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Are you OK if I remove my name from those cron jobs I would never > > look into anyway (even if I understand your intention to make more > > noise about these). > > I don't mind. One of the things I'd like to work on during DebCon

Re: Problems in blends importers (Was: The certificate of 'ftp-master.debian.org' is not trusted.)

2015-08-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 11/08/15 at 17:05 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > its been some time since this was discussed but now at Blends sprint > at DebConf I try to look into this, > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:12:46PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > My strategy was to fix the importers which I know

Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 31.07.2012 08:29, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: >The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: > > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc > >I have no idea why i

Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adam. On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: > >The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: > > > > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc > > > >I have no idea why it is mentioning > > > >

Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc I have no idea why it is mentioning beast-doc, beast-examples for certain architectures even if these packages are arch=all and

Re: Problems witht the QA redirector

2009-05-21 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Raphael Geissert, Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:45:57PM -0500 |=- > By the way, could you please update the DEHS link on pkg-perl.a.d.o > so that > it uses report.php instead of maintainer.php? > Just replace it with: > http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?login=pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth

Re: Problems witht the QA redirector

2009-05-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi Martín, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 20:01, Raphael Geissert > wrote: >> (basically what I told you yesterday via IRC.) > > Er... I don't have that in my backlog... Which channel? I didn't explain all that, but: #debian-devel: 16:54 Tincho: the sf redirector iss

Re: Problems witht the QA redirector

2009-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
Hi! On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 20:01, Raphael Geissert wrote: > (basically what I told you yesterday via IRC.) Er... I don't have that in my backlog... Which channel? > This has now been fixed by adding another mirror that doesn't require > enhanced matching. The change introducing the new mirror

Re: Problems witht the QA redirector

2009-05-20 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi Martín, (basically what I told you yesterday via IRC.) Martín Ferrari wrote: [...] > Last week the redirector started to give server errors (500 - No > mirror could satisfy the request. Please report this message to > debian-qa@lists.debian.org) and today it happened again. This has now been

Re: Problems witht the QA redirector

2009-05-18 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:25:06AM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi there, > > Last week the redirector started to give server errors (500 - No > mirror could satisfy the request. Please report this message to > debian-qa@lists.debian.org) and today it happened again. It seems that > this doesn't

Re: problems compiling arla

2001-04-11 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Steve! You wrote: > No, not a library problem - this is kernel code. At a guess I would say the > module source is for a different kernel version/series than that against > which you are compiling. Well, that's quite weird, since the README explictly says that 2.2 kernels are supported, and I

Re: problems compiling arla

2001-04-11 Thread Steve Dodd
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:09:47AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > I am trying to bring the arla package up to date. However, I am having > problems getting it compiled. I suspect I am missing some libraries, but > since there are no build-deps, I don't know which one(s). Does anyone > maybe have an