Barry deFreese wrote:
[...]
>
> Well that's what prompted this e-mail. I tend to get little to no
> response on my questions. Is that because I ask on IRC? Should I be
> asking here? There aren't exactly large volumes of traffic on this list
> either.
Try in both places, and don't forget to u
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Barry de Freese:
>> I've been working on removals and QA uploads and such but I feel like
>> I'm working in a bit of a vacuum. Do we have any establish guidelines
>> for removing a package vs PROP_RM?
> The QA group doesn't have any established, official authority
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ah, right. I missed that. For QA packages, I don't think you need to go
through PROP_RM. Just double-check with someone if you have doubts, and
request removal.
Lucas,
Well that's what prompted this e-mail. I tend to get little to no
response on my questions. Is th
On 05/12/08 at 08:20 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 04/12/08 at 13:52 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I've been working on removals and QA uploads and such but I feel like
>>> I'm working in a bit of a vacuum. Do we have any establish
>>> guidel
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/12/08 at 13:52 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Folks,
I've been working on removals and QA uploads and such but I feel like
I'm working in a bit of a vacuum. Do we have any establish guidelines
for removing a package vs PROP_RM?
The QA group doesn't have
On 04/12/08 at 13:52 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've been working on removals and QA uploads and such but I feel like
> I'm working in a bit of a vacuum. Do we have any establish guidelines
> for removing a package vs PROP_RM?
The QA group doesn't have any established, official
6 matches
Mail list logo
