Re: Package, which does not go into testing for a long time

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-14 00:09]: > Yes, of course. I've done some small research and some packages really looks > like orphaned (i.e. top two: vje-deltad pips). So I think that this is Yeah, those are orphaned now. If you have other packages/maintainers which look bad

Re: Package, which does not go into testing for a long time

2003-07-13 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:31:16AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Please take care. Packages' progression into testing is not a terribly > accurate indicator of their maintainers' activity; > there may well be dependencies that they can't do much about. If you > wanted to use it as a guideline for ma

Re: Package, which does not go into testing for a long time

2003-07-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:11:46AM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > I am a NM candidate (processing my NM queue) and I would like to provide > some help to QA Team. > > There are some packages[1] which do not go into testing for a really > long time (the longer is over 900 days). I would like t