On Fri, 10 May 2013, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I would also suggest not displaying bugs where someone is actively taking
> > care of it (i.e. when a owner is set even though it's not often used).
>
> Creative idea, but I'm afraid that setting the owner is not a sufficiently
> common practice to base
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide
> > to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one.
>
> I also tend to think that doing it recursively
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> To start with a small sample. Also, I think that some RC bugs are easy to
> fix,
> so don't need advertising on so many PTS pages. For example, some FTBFS bugs
> can be quite easy to fix. Now, where to draw the line. Bugs tagged "help"
>
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > There are RC bugs in dependencies : #579647 #545414 #658739 #566351
> > #368297 #601667 #658896 #628671
>
> Several of these bugs are merged, I think we should only link to one
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:51:08AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide
> > to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one.
>
> AOL on the fact that d
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I started from RC bugs (grave, critical, serious) tagged "help". We
> > currently
> > have 18 RC bugs tagged "help". I matches these 18 bugs with all reverse
> > dependencies, recursively, both build- and plain reverse dependencies.
Hi,
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Comments ?
>
> I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide
> to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one.
I also tend to think that doing it recursively is not a good idea in
general. Or maybe only for pa
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> I started from RC bugs (grave, critical, serious) tagged "help". We currently
> have 18 RC bugs tagged "help". I matches these 18 bugs with all reverse
> dependencies, recursively, both build- and plain reverse dependencies.
> Recommends and
8 matches
Mail list logo
