Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-11 Thread Matthew Vernon
Christian Kurz writes: > [There's no need to Cc me, as I'm also on debian-qa, as you could assume [noted] > No, Wichert doesn't want to maintain it and wanted it to orphan it and I > think no one needs to take a package over under some pressure. You > should always decide for you own, if you

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-09 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 10:13:53AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 00-12-09 Gordon Sadler wrote: > > Pardon my ignorance, but the libpam-pwdb that this bug refers to not > > being available seems to be in an odd position. It IS available, > > however only on auric, testing. I track quite a few mi

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-09 Thread Christian Kurz
On 00-12-09 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001209 00:15]: > > tbm's package seems to be on ftp-master, so I'll wait and see what > > happens (if there's a conflict use his instead of mine, since I just > > hacked it to build a non-rc version in a hurry, whereas he

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-09 Thread Christian Kurz
On 00-12-09 Gordon Sadler wrote: > Pardon my ignorance, but the libpam-pwdb that this bug refers to not > being available seems to be in an odd position. It IS available, > however only on auric, testing. I track quite a few mirrors, to Well, maybe the maintainer of libpam-pwdb can comment on thi

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-09 Thread Christian Kurz
[There's no need to Cc me, as I'm also on debian-qa, as you could assume from my signature. ;)] On 00-12-09 Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Wichert just orphaned lockvc in IRC when I talked with him about the > > release-critical-bug in it. I then tried to recompile lockvc here on > > woody and make

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-09 Thread Gordon Sadler
Pardon my ignorance, but the libpam-pwdb that this bug refers to not being available seems to be in an odd position. It IS available, however only on auric, testing. I track quite a few mirrors, to include testing, experimental apt, and experimental X4 but only semi-official debs, no Helix or othe

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001209 00:15]: > tbm's package seems to be on ftp-master, so I'll wait and see what > happens (if there's a conflict use his instead of mine, since I just > hacked it to build a non-rc version in a hurry, whereas he's fixed > more bugs). Ah, I didn't fix the

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-08 Thread Matthew Vernon
> OK, I'm uploading a new version now. At least it compiles... oops. I built an upload, and uploaded it before I got this mail. tbm's package seems to be on ftp-master, so I'll wait and see what happens (if there's a conflict use his instead of mine, since I just hacked it to build a non-rc

Re: Orphaning of lockvc

2000-12-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001208 21:44]: > I then tried to recompile lockvc here on woody and make an orphaning > upload which failed for me. So Wichert and I would appreciate if > someone of you could take this task over. OK, I'm uploading a new version now. At least it compiles...