Hi ..
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:43:21AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>>#123484: ITA: gnobog -- GNOME Bookmarks Organizer
>I uploaded it .. :)
>Ok, there is a buildbug on hppa, but I think, I should fix it tomorrow!
The last problem is fixed,too. This deb builded on all arches
successfully.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Ugh, smupsd is to be pulled from woody? *arg* I really need that package
> for our server and I am not sure if the package I built for potato
> will continue working. Perhaps I am taking this over but it is a bit
> complicated to test a package for
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:18:24PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > * #143030: smupsd should not release with woody
> ---> I did my statement according to this package which was introduced
> and orphaned by myself. It is not a target for woody but I would
> love to see it in Debian
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > My vote for archiving those software you decide to remove to
>
> All removed packages are kept in /org/ftp.debian.org/morgue/rhona/
> on auric (and a similar directory on pandora) as dis
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>#123484: ITA: gnobog -- GNOME Bookmarks Organizer
I uploaded it .. :)
Ok, there is a buildbug on hppa, but I think, I should fix it tomorrow!
:)
Regards
Jan
--
One time, you all will be emulated by linux!
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> My vote for archiving those software you decide to remove to
All removed packages are kept in /org/ftp.debian.org/morgue/rhona/
on auric (and a similar directory on pandora) as disk space permits.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EM
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> Which -qa doesn't have the capacity to do. One of the zope-* packages in
> question sat with release-critical bugs for over a *year*; I finally
Well, as I said I fixed and tested those zope-* packages I was interested
in as -qa.
In general I agree with yo
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:59:04PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > It takes, what, twenty minutes to upload a package with the Maintainer:
> > field changed? A few hours every couple of months are enough to keep
> > it fairly adequately maintained. If th
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:59:04PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hmm, you do not honestly want to tell me that "Maintaining" is equal
> to uploading a package with correctly set maintainer field.
No. What I'm saying is that no one cares enough about these packages to
do that.
> It is
> caring ab
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
(but my text is related to ajt who atempts to remove those packages
completely.)
> * #143005: zope-pythonmethod should not release with woody
A real reson would be the following quote from the URL mentioned in
the copyright file:
As of versi
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> It takes, what, twenty minutes to upload a package with the Maintainer:
> field changed? A few hours every couple of months are enough to keep
> it fairly adequately maintained. If the packages aren't worth that much
> time from anyone, they're not worth
* Anthony Towns [20020416 15:35]:
> This isn't any easier on anyone than just sending a single bug
> report to ftp.debian.org saying "these packages are unsuitable for
> release", and it's a lot more of a nuisance since those bugs have to
> be closed individually.
You always claim that filing a s
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:13:30AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Further, it's still not clear why these packages should be kept in sid,
> > if they aren't suitable for woody and no one is interested in
> > maintaining them.
> I think it is no valit as
Le Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:35:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> This isn't any easier on anyone than just sending a single bug report
> to ftp.debian.org saying "these packages are unsuitable for release",
> and it's a lot more of a nuisance since those bugs have to be closed
> individually.
Y
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Further, it's still not clear why these packages should be kept in sid,
> if they aren't suitable for woody and no one is interested in
> maintaining them.
I think it is no valit assumption that no one is interested in
maintaining them just because they
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:09:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020407 02:26]:
> > There are a couple of orphaned packages in testing which were never
> > part of a stable release.
> I have now filed serious bugs on a couple of those packages to pull
>
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020407 02:26]:
> There are a couple of orphaned packages in testing which were never
> part of a stable release.
I have now filed serious bugs on a couple of those packages to pull
them out of testing. In my first run I took packages orphaned for
over 100
Hi
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than
> > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this
> > purpose - the form
Em Thu, 11 Apr 2002 22:54:17 +0200, Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > # 87431: O: ilu -- Inter Language Unification system
>
> I doubt anybody is really using this. It is a big mess and there
> are better alter
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> # 87431: O: ilu -- Inter Language Unification system
I doubt anybody is really using this. It is a big mess and there
are better alternatives. And the potato version did not really work
iirc (I was the maintainer for a while but n
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than
> the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this
> purpose - the format for bug titles and to a greater extent the way
> followups for bug repor
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Chris Cheney indends to adopt the package, yes, but he only mailed
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of properly renaming the bug to ITA.
I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than
the BTS to handle the WNPP
retitle 127699 ITA: c-cpp-reference -- c/c++ reference set for kdevelop
thanks
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:48:19AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > #127699: O: c-cpp-reference -- c/c++ reference set for kdevelop
> >
> > This is logged as
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:25PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > #100252: ITA: powershell -- powerful terminal emulator for GNOME
>
> I'm working on a new version of powershell, but that might take a bit
> longer as I intend a com
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Someone is interested in adopting the following packages. I pinged
> them to see if they are still interested. If I don't hear back from
> them, I will probably request removal from testing (justification:
> it's not clear w
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:48:19AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > #127699: O: c-cpp-reference -- c/c++ reference set for kdevelop
>
> This is logged as having been adopted by Chris Cheney
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but was later reset to orphaned by Uwe Heremann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with no reason
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #135057: O: manpages-ru -- Russian translations of Linux manpages
This is in the russian task. It would probably be better to leave it,
unless it has other bugs.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #127699: O: c-cpp-reference -- c/c++ reference set for kdevelop
This is logged as having been adopted by Chris Cheney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but was later reset to orphaned by Uwe Heremann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with no reason logged i
28 matches
Mail list logo
