Steve Langasek wrote:
At this point, it looks like ctsim is in line to be the last wx2.4 package
in the archive. In that circumstance, I don't think we should ship wx2.4
with lenny for the benefit of a single reverse-dep; that's about 400MB of
oldlibs packages carried around for one applicati
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi folks, a couple of quick updates on wx2.4 packages.
>>> - ctsim, maintainer is also upstream
>> I've talk to Emmet on this one also. Apparently ctsim builds fine 2.6 but
>> segfaults and he is having a hard time tracking down
Hi folks, a couple of quick updates on wx2.4 packages.
Barry deFreese wrote:
Regis Boudin wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2007 09:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
(random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be
accomplished f
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:41:24AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
>>>
>>> - jugglemaster, first ever upload last month (!?)
>> He says this one needs several hours of work.
> Attached is a dpatch patch to build jugglemaster with wxgtk2.6.
> Unfortunately it segfaults immediately for me. I'm ha
Barry deFreese wrote:
Regis Boudin wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2007 09:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
(random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be
accomplished for
lenny.
And one of the reverse-deps of gtk+1.
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hope this helps. Also, in case you do file oldlib transition bugs,
please try to adhere to the usertags I have used, or tell me the bug
numbers, and I can usertag them.
Half a year ago I filed bugs against packages still using freetype1.
S
On 2007-12-20, Regis Boudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - jugglemaster, first ever upload last month (!?)
I think I poked the maintainer about it was a bad idea to upload
something that uses wx2.4 as something new.
iirc, the package both have wx gui or qt gui, so the wx gui could be
disabled...
Regis Boudin wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2007 09:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
(random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished for
lenny.
And one of the reverse-deps of gtk+1.2 is wxwindows2.4, which
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hope this helps. Also, in case you do file oldlib transition bugs,
please try to adhere to the usertags I have used, or tell me the bug
numbers, and I can usertag them.
Half a year ago I filed bugs against packages still using freetype1.
S
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Hope this helps. Also, in case you do file oldlib transition bugs,
> please try to adhere to the usertags I have used, or tell me the bug
> numbers, and I can usertag them.
Half a year ago I filed bugs against packages still using freetype1.
Several have been fixed by now, b
Regis Boudin wrote:
On Thu, December 20, 2007 09:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
(random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished for
lenny.
And one of the reverse-deps of gtk+1.2 is wxwindows2.4, whi
On Thu, December 20, 2007 09:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> (random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
>> glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished for
>> lenny.
>
> And one of the reverse-deps of gtk+1.2 is wxwindows2.4, which takes up
> about 5x
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:17:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
>> You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely.
> (random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
> glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:17:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> (random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
> glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished for
> lenny.
I am working on collating data slowly, for package porting/removal
requests.
Andreas Tille wrote:
You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely.
(random rumbling:) libgtk1 has to die (and all it's requisites, like
glib1.2). would be very, very, very nice if this can be accomplished for
lenny.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, C
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:17:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely.
> I doubt that it is possible to remove oldlibs completely and thus
> it would make sense to specify which old libraries should be
> removed (as Lenny release goal). In
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I am trying to help out by finding rdepends of packages in the oldlibs
section, and am hoping that cleaning up the oldlibs section could be
made a Lenny release goal (distant dream).
You should probably define "cleaning up oldlibs" more precisely.
I do
17 matches
Mail list logo
