Le Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Christian Kurz écrivait:
> On 01-02-01 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > up the release process? The answer is at least partially evident: we
> > need people actually doing QA. It looks like Raphael, whom, AFAIK, was
> > playing QA coodinator, got caught
Hi Anthony, Hi Debian-QA!
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There are actually at least three sorts of tests we can do:
> We can also
> check packages don't depend on lower priority packages
There are currently approx
Hi m2-,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:50:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I was just watching a discussion on #debian-devel and the subject of QA
> has come up yet again.
Seems like that happens from time to time :)
> The questions that pop up are basically the same as always, namely, h
On 01-02-01 Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> up the release process? The answer is at least partially evident: we
> need people actually doing QA. It looks like Raphael, whom, AFAIK, was
> playing QA coodinator, got caught up in RL, and other people are in a
> similar situation. Can we have an i
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:56:28PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The other question that popped up is "what's holding up packages in
> > unstable and what can QA do to help that?"
> Go through the update_excuses list, find a package that looks interesting
^^^
>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:50:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Once we have the people, the other part of the answer is not that
> clear. IMO, a possible solution would be to have a sort of test suite.
> Since the size of Debian together with the size of the QA team makes
> the very id
6 matches
Mail list logo