On 00-04-01 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Shorty raised that point yesterday on IRC...
> > Additionally QA is nothing that needs to be done in private behind
> > closed doors.
> ... however he said he'd rather get it closed to match the nam
> Thus I propose to migrate debian-qa-private into debian-qa and
> remove debian-qa-private.
FWIW I agree with this. I've no idea what the qa-private people get up to
though ;-)
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.deb
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication
> > between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus
> > qa-private is not private right now and everybody can sub
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> it does not make sense to have debian-qa-private as list for communication
> between qa comittee and members as an ultra-secret cabal thing. Thus
> qa-private is not private right now and everybody can subscribe there.
Yes. The "pr
4 matches
Mail list logo