Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-16 Thread Grant Bowman
* Anthony Towns [011215 23:26]: > I'm not sure why everyone's Cc'ing me on this thread. Sorry, I won't Cc you anymore. Heh. > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:50:01PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > > What about people like myself who are stuck with crappy bits of > > > software like trn which have lo

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-16 Thread Anthony Towns
I'm not sure why everyone's Cc'ing me on this thread. On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:50:01PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > What about people like myself who are stuck with crappy bits of > > software like trn which have lots of bugs which are unlikely to be > > fixed any time soon? It seems like my e

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-15 Thread Grant Bowman
* Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011215 12:17]: > Grant Bowman writes: > > I believe it would be a real boost to those developers who are doing > > such an excellent job in keeping their packages bug-free to make some > > kind of public praising from the QA group. I would be happy to work

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:42:12AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > > I could do it, but I believe aj (cc'ed on this mail) already does almost > > exactly what we need. Could the resulting data file be placed somewhere > > public? > > Additional a statistic

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-13 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > I could do it, but I believe aj (cc'ed on this mail) already does almost > exactly what we need. Could the resulting data file be placed somewhere > public? Additional a statistic / would be interesting. I admit, that this could be misleading (for

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:25:00PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011209 12:47]: > > How about the month's top bug-closers? That's easy to generate if you > > have access to /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/index.db on master, as that > > only stores open bugs and bugs w

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-11 Thread Grant Bowman
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011209 12:47]: > How about the month's top bug-closers? That's easy to generate if you > have access to /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/index.db on master, as that > only stores open bugs and bugs with activity within the last month. > Providing that you can handle de

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:55:19PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011208 11:07]: > > I think that we might do better to consider a user- and > > developer-driven system, maybe more along the lines of the netfilter > > scoreboard: > > > > http://netfilter.samba.o

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-08 Thread Grant Bowman
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011208 11:07]: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:20:52AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > Christian Kurz and I came up with some other factors that are measurable > > and may need to be taken into account to increase the validity of the > > data. Just the average ope

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-07 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:20:52AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > Christian Kurz and I came up with some other factors that are measurable > and may need to be taken into account to increase the validity of the > data. Just the average open unarchived bugs isn't very accurate though > I feel it's a

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-07 Thread Grant Bowman
Christian Kurz and I came up with some other factors that are measurable and may need to be taken into account to increase the validity of the data. Just the average open unarchived bugs isn't very accurate though I feel it's a good start. * severity (critical, grave, serious, important, normal