On Fri, Jul 17, 1998 at 03:06:39AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
> ol
Brian White wrote:
> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> been sent to the maintainers of these packages but some of the packages with
> older bugs could probably use some assistanc
> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I have a fix for this and have made fixed .debs but haven't
Ben> uploaded them since I don't have a Pilot to test them with
Ben> right now.
Ben> I will upload them as soon as I find someone to test them.
Put them where
> "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> pilot-link 24361 pilot-link appears to do no error checking
Brian> !! [0] (Dermot Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
I have a fix for this and have made fixed .debs but haven't uploaded
them since I don't have a Pilot to test them
Brian White wrote:
>wu-ftpd-academ17401 netstd overwrites ftpd.8.gz [161] (Heiko Schlitter
>mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>wu-ftpd-academ20355 wu-ftpd: contains ftpd.8.gz which is also present i
>n netstd [96] (Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
This has been fixed in
> > The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> > distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> > been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> ^
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 09:19:30AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:24:34PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jdassen> Galen introduced the current two-suites situation in hamm
> jdassen> for reasons that I find sound. Matthias and I have
> jdassen> maintained and doc
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:28:20PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> jdassen> More like lack of patience on my part. One patch has been
> jdassen> accepted (the location of the "trampolines" paper).
>
> Where is that now? Is it my dir on master?
The location that's now included is a dir
> "jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jdassen> More like lack of patience on my part. One patch has been
jdassen> accepted (the location of the "trampolines" paper).
Where is that now? Is it my dir on master? Or was it copied
someplace else for that? Should I spend
> "jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jdassen> Galen introduced the current two-suites situation in hamm
jdassen> for reasons that I find sound. Matthias and I have
jdassen> maintained and documented this situation in our
jdassen> non-maintainer work.
Where may
> "jdassen" == jdassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jdassen> These bugs are out of my league. I have tried to get the
jdassen> attention of the folks on egcs-bugs, but failed.
>> gcc 19453 altgcc still vulnerable to /tmp symlink attack. [72]
>> (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 08:09:54PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Yet earlier, JHM wrote:
> > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
> > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > egcs-bugs
\begin{bitch}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in promote-ESR mode writes:
> - gcc 2.8.x .
[...]
> The FSF's gcc development is still very cathedral, so the chances of
> getting bugs we find in it fixed within an acceptable time are small.
[ ...]
> - egcs 1.0.x (which roughly is a further development on
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 10:40:09AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to remove "-force-mem" from the list of
> > > optimizations done by "-O2"?
> >
> > I don't know. I'm not an expert on (e)gcc internals.
>
> My problem is that a lot of people use "-O2" for their compiles. If
> > > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > >
> > > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > > egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
> > > received no
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 09:59:43AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114]
> > > (Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
> > Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> > egcs-bugs list asking them to look i
> > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114] (Galen
> > Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
> egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
> received no responses.
Would it be
> egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114] (Galen
> Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to the
egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but have
received no responses.
The bug only occurs wit
[Background: I've been one of the people who have done NMUs of Galen's
compiler packages]
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 03:06:38AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [106] (Galen
> Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> gcc 22292 CRITICAL:
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 03:16:24AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> rem
I vote for sorting "by maintainer". It would make it simpler to fine
ones own packages then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Hamm
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 03:41:31 -0400
> cwnn 20539 Overlap between cwnn, wnn, and kwnn [35] (Keita
> Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
This bug is already fixed by moving overlapping f
Brian White wrote:
>The following bug reports *must* be fixed ...
>
Brian, this is a useful list, but please sort it by Maintainer or by Package
rather than by bug number:
==
Bugs in package order:
==
Bug # Package Name Bug Description [days old]
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 20980: kaffe- kaffe: kaffe depends on jdk-common [0] (Vincent
> Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
I had filed a bug against ftp.debian.org (#20165) to take it out of hamm
and orphan it several weeks ago.
It's beyond my comprehension to unders
> >The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> >distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> >been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> >remedy these bugs.
>
> >21106: postgresql -
Brian White wrote:
>The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
>distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
>been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
>remedy these bugs.
>21106: postgresql
> Elvis is indeed no longer in hamm. How do I get elvis completely
> removed from the bug tracking system (which has my email address from
> a couple of years ago per the old stable version of elvis), and listed
> as orphined, redundant, with an upstream maintainer that ignores us
> completely? I
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 1998 at 03:06:30AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> > > distribution can progress further in its development
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 1998 at 03:06:30AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> > distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> > been sent to the maintainers o
On Fri, Apr 10, 1998 at 03:06:30AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the current frozen Debian
> distribution can progress further in its development cycle. Reminders have
> been sent to the maintainers of these packages yet nothing has been done to
> rem
Brian White writes:
> eDepends on comerr2g, e2fslibsg, libc6... [39] (Yann Dirson <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>)
1.10-13 fixes that in Incoming
> 20211: kbd - kbd: resizecons does extremely silly things with
> /tmp/selection.pid [0] (Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
0.95-10 fixes th
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Brian White wrote:
> (Barring objections, the next post of this will go to debian-devel-annouce.)
Do folks only signed up on debian-devel receive this automatically? I
don't think that I am subscribed.
> 19347: libc5-dev- libc5-dev: no-copyright-file LI#82 [16] (Hel
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 11309: boot-floppies- PCMCIA drivers not installable on 6-19
> rescue/driver floppies [246] (Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
This is a problem with bo and not hamm. I tested hamm's rescue disk with
the pcmcia-modules package from hamm last nig
hello
brian> The following bug reports *must* be fixed before the
brian> current unstable Debian distribution can progress further
brian> in its development cycle.
brian> [...]
brian> #19792: gnuplot - gnuplot: use of /tmp/*$$ in an insecure
brian> fashion [0] (tib
35 matches
Mail list logo
