Re: List of 52 packages it would be nice to get rid of

2006-05-30 Thread David Moreno Garza
Roland Mas wrote: > To make things clear: yes, I have utterly neglected the gforge > package in the last nine months. That was partly because I spent > three months traveling, but also because I've been preparing to change > jobs. The good news is that I should be totally freelance in a bit > u

Re: List of 52 packages it would be nice to get rid of

2006-05-30 Thread Roland Mas
Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-05-25 16:12:15 -0400 : > I think that gforge is a fairly important package, even if it has > few installations. Isn't gforge running on Alioth? If so, that to > me is reason enough to keep it in. If Roland needs some help, I can > probably help out starting in about a m

Re: List of 52 packages it would be nice to get rid of

2006-05-26 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
(Roland, here's the context of my email by the way: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/05/msg00026.html ) Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Kevin B. McCarty wrote: >>* gforge >> >>The most commonly installed binary package, gforge-common, has only 12 >>installations (again I bend my rule slightly)

Re: List of 52 packages it would be nice to get rid of

2006-05-25 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * gforge > > The most commonly installed binary package, gforge-common, has only 12 > installations (again I bend my rule slightly). One of its packages has > been uninstallable for 64 days. There is also a possible > security-relat