Re: Fixed in NMU of dstooltk 2.0-4

2001-08-25 Thread James Troup
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to check for the maintainer e-mail address instead? Sure. > Only [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be in use (the former is > deprecated). 20:22:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $egrep "QA|Quality Assurance" indices/Maintainers | cut -

Re: Fixed in NMU of dstooltk 2.0-4

2001-08-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:09:34PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > tag 96034 + fixed > > > > quit > > > > This message was generated automatically in response to a > > non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. > > Grr, can you guys please standard

Re: Fixed in NMU of dstooltk 2.0-4

2001-08-22 Thread James Troup
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tag 96034 + fixed > > quit > > This message was generated automatically in response to a > non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. Grr, can you guys please standardize on one Maintainer: line and stick to it? So far we have: o "Debian QA