On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:26:54PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:58:42AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > fhs.html tracks testing, not unstable.
>
> Ah, I didn't remember this changed.
Yeah, I swapped it over once everything in unstable/i386 was fixed.
> > The version of
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:58:42AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:55:18PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > Why is fhs.html listing rat as having stuff in /usr/doc?
> >
> > The version instable has, and sparc/unstable too, but I just checked
> > i386 and it's ok. What is cau
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 12:55:18PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Why is fhs.html listing rat as having stuff in /usr/doc?
>
> The version instable has, and sparc/unstable too, but I just checked
> i386 and it's ok. What is causing this false positive?
fhs.html tracks testing, not unstable. The ve
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:20:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > 7. glimpse
> > > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > Has a grave security bug fi
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010808 12:48]:
> > 6. gcc-m68k-linux
>
> It's a cross-compiler. It perhaps should be removed since we've lost
> cross-binutils, at least if nobody is willing to maintain it; somebody
> should contact the m68k folks to see if they still want it.
I did that al
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010808 18:09]:
> 16. rscheme-modules
> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Does not build from source. NMU needed.
> I had a look at this, but because I know nothing of scheme, I have no
> idea how to make it build.
Ralf Treinen has adopted this and is
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:51:09PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> > > > > 7. glimpse
> > > > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >
> > > > > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > > > > Probably won't make it in
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:51:09PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> > > > 7. glimpse
> > > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > > > Probably won't make it into woody anyway. Is the maintainer MIA?
> > >
> > >
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > 7. glimpse
> > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > > Probably won't make it into woody anyway. Is
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's the last non-free thing our servers rely on, isn't it? Cool. :)
qmail
--
Moshe Zadka - http://moshez.geek
(if you're not cool, http://moshez.org is still working)
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > 7. glimpse
> > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > > Probably won't make it in
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > 7. glimpse
> > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > Probably won't make it into woody anyway. Is the maintainer MIA?
>
> We currently need it for the
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. arla
> 2. arla-dev
> 3. arla-modules-2.0.36
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark)
>
> Package is not installable (depends on kerberos4kth and libreadlineg2,
> which don't exist), does not build from source, and is horribly outdated.
> It sh
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:09:33PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> 13. onshore-timesheet-el
> Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Patch in BTS, NMU in two weeks.
FHS unrelated, onshore-timesheets is uninstallable and Adam won't be
looking at it for a while, as he's focusing on the bf's. Anyon
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:09:33PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> 6. gcc-m68k-linux
> Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Package is not installable and has build problems on hppa. I don't know
> why this package has Architecture "Any" anyway. Isn't it a m68k only
> package? Or is it a cro
Hi debian-qa!
> It looks like we're getting somewhere. Most packages have patches in
> BTS, or are being NMU'd. Some might have to be removed from the
> archive. Only rscheme-modules still needs work.
Also gcc-m68k-linux and glimpse need patches.
--
Kind regards,
+--
16 matches
Mail list logo
