On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:10:06PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > ... and Request-for-Sponsoring, the pending tag could be extremely useful
> > > for
> > > tracking status of all sponsoring reqs. Every new sponsoree req could
> > > reopen a previous bug and a new sponsor upload could f
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:20:02AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I suggest that you don't waste your time on trying to do this until we
> > implement bug ownership.
>
> Ok, I suppose you'll announce this somewhere.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I suggest that you don't waste your time on trying to do this until we
> implement bug ownership.
Ok, I suppose you'll announce this somewhere.
> ... and Request-for-Sponsoring, the pending tag could be extremely useful for
> trackin
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:55:17AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
> >
> > Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
> >
> > Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:08:34AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 11:05]:
> > I'm still interested and willing to work on it. I had good input on this
> > privately, so i think it's worth of implementing. I'm still on vacation, but
> > i'l
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
>
> Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
>
> Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
> (Co-Maintainer|Help|Whatever)
>
> Unfortunately I haven't had the time yet t
* Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 11:05]:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
> >
> > Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
> >
> > Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
On Saturday 09 August 2003 09:29, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
> (Co-Maintainer|Help|Whatever)
>
> Unfortunately I haven't had the time yet to say it's probably a good
> idea, and noone else said anything.
What are the steps required t
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-08 23:46]:
> > someplace where I can find packages for which the maintainer wishes to find
> > co-maintainers ? Would it be worth doing it (I would then volunteer) ?
>
> Sounds like a job for WNPP.
Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
Ju
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:17:36AM +0200, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt
> maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found
> this information ... and did not found it.
>
> Some maintainers use the PT
10 matches
Mail list logo
