On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Attached is a small patch on top of the previous one: 'fixed' is not a
> documented value for a pending bug, 'done' is. Just happened to
> notice, but did not see any effect in cases I tested with.
Thanks, I merged your two patches as I got python-debianb
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>>> This switches to using debianbts instead of SOAPpy. To be applied over
>>> the LDAP->nm.d.o REST patch in https://bugs.debian.org/797223#1
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Thanks for this. Right now tracker.debian.org still runs jessie.
>
> DSA is actively looking to upgrade as many hosts as possible, and I know
> a DSA member asked around about who to c
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Thanks for this. Right now tracker.debian.org still runs jessie.
DSA is actively looking to upgrade as many hosts as possible, and I know
a DSA member asked around about who to contact about upgrading ticharich
("is it buxy only or
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> This switches to using debianbts instead of SOAPpy. To be applied over
>> the LDAP->nm.d.o REST patch in https://bugs.debian.org/797223#10
>
> Thanks for this. Right now tracker.debian.org still r
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> This switches to using debianbts instead of SOAPpy. To be applied over
> the LDAP->nm.d.o REST patch in https://bugs.debian.org/797223#10
Thanks for this. Right now tracker.debian.org still runs jessie. Do
you know if your code works with python-debianbts
6 matches
Mail list logo
