Re: old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050301 10:19]: > If the upstream is dead, I'd close the RFP saying this. Will take a look at that again, when I'm back. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description

Re: old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-28 10:10]: > BTW: I recently take a look at the WNPP bugs, and found many old RFPs. > Some are some years old, and I wonder what should be done with them. > Some of them are retitled ITPs, some even with a dead upstream. Old ITPs are sometimes ping

old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

Hi! * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050219 22:20]: > > Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply > > close the RFP? > Please do the former; this way the person who filed the RFP will be > informed when the package enters the archive. BTW: I recently take a look at the WNPP

Re: RFP+ITP for the same package

* Tommaso Moroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-19 15:05]: > Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply > close the RFP? Please do the former; this way the person who filed the RFP will be informed when the package enters the archive. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- T

Re: RFP+ITP for the same package

On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote: > In the wnpp I noticed some RFP + ITP about the same package. > Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply > close the RFP? Definitely don't close the RFP, because whoever opened it will probably like to know when the pa

RFP+ITP for the same package

Hi! In the wnpp I noticed some RFP + ITP about the same package. Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply close the RFP? Regards, -- Tommaso Moroni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE