atch (copyright, rules etc)? I know for NMU's the rule
>is no invasive changes.
>
You are free to do whatever changes to the package - since a QA upload
is done on a package without a maintainer, there is nobody who will get
annoyed by a change of packaging style or similar. The developers
r
Hi,
As part of my effort to help in the QA Team (Thanks to Paul Wise for
heads up), I have been looking at the QA package uploads.
When preparing a QA upload would it be expected that the package be
brought up to scratch (copyright, rules etc)? I know for NMU's the rule
is no invasive changes.
R
We don't currently maintain e16-related packages, so don't really have anything
to say :).
You might to see that with ljlane, the e16 maintainer.
Cheers
--
Albin Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Epplets:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.10.dfsg1-1.dsc
> Was already uploaded once, got rejected for some missing copyright holders,
> which I believe I have fixed. ( I believe anibal_
Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 29 mai 2008, vers 06:10, Barry
deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
libpam-foreground:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libpam-foreground/libpam-foreground_0.5.dsc
Thomas (tomv_w) has been looking at this for me so t
Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 29 mai 2008, vers 06:10, Barry
deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
libpam-foreground:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libpam-foreground/libpam-foreground_0.5.dsc
Thomas (tomv_w) has been looking at this for me so t
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 29 mai 2008, vers 06:10, Barry
deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> libpam-foreground:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libpam-foreground/libpam-foreground_0.5.dsc
> Thomas (tomv_w) has been looking at this for me so this might be taken
> c
Hi folks,
I have a few QA uploads sitting on mentors if anyone has time.
Epplets:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.10.dfsg1-1.dsc
Was already uploaded once, got rejected for some missing copyright
holders, which I believe I have fixed. ( I believe anibal_ was
tim hall wrote:
Hi Barry,
you wrote:
Hi,
While working on removing libqt3-compat-headers, I ran across this
orhpaned package as well so here is one to fix this issue as well as
standards update, etc, etc.
If someone has time to review/upload, I would appreciate it.
http://mentors.debian.ne
Hi Barry,
you wrote:
Hi,
While working on removing libqt3-compat-headers, I ran across this
orhpaned package as well so here is one to fix this issue as well as
standards update, etc, etc.
If someone has time to review/upload, I would appreciate it.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/con
On 26/01/2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc
> > Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs.
>
> debdiff betwe
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc
> Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs.
debdiff between the old and new binary:
File lists identical (a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:37:17PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> New one one mentors.
Uploaded
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:57:12PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I think I finally got it right. At least it display OK for me and
> lintian is happy now. I've put a new one on mentors.
Uploaded
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
as the name (for whom the copyright notice is missing in
debian/copyright BTW), not Patrik Rædman.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kxgenerator/kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.dsc
Lintian says:
W: kxgenerator: menu-item-uses-apps-section /usr/share/menu/kxgenerator:2
W: kxgenerator: menu-it
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:56:40PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> OK, new one on mentors. Let me know if I missed anything.
Uploaded.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> >as the name (for whom the copyright notice is missing in
> >debian/copyright BTW), not Patrik Rædman.
> >
> >Gruesse,
> >
> OK, I think
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quack-el/quack-el_0.30-2.dsc
debian/copyright: copyright statement missing, inexact reference to GPL
version, while the source has a clear GPL 2+ statem
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sn/sn_0.3.8-7.dsc
The Makefile is not autogenerated so no need for test trickery during
clean, just remove the "-"
While you're at it remove the "rm -f
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kxgenerator/kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.dsc
Lintian says:
W: kxgenerator: menu-item-uses-apps-section /usr/share/menu/kxgenerator:2
W: kxgenerator: menu-item-creates-new-section Apps/System
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quack-el/quack-el_0.30-2.dsc
debian/copyright: copyright statement missing, inexact reference to GPL
version, while the source has a clear GPL 2+ statement.
you can also remove the comme
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sn/sn_0.3.8-7.dsc
The Makefile is not autogenerated so no need for test trickery during
clean, just remove the "-"
While you're at it remove the "rm -f debian/substvars", no idea what
tha
Hi folks,
Sorry for the cross-post but since these are QA uploads, I wasn't sure
which list would be preferred. I have 4 packages from the Orphaned
Packages with incorrect maintainer lists that I have put on mentors if
someone has time to review/upload.
http://mentors.debian.net/d
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:09:07AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Also realize that Dillo is effectively dead upstream. I undertsand that
> many people use it in Debian. However, it may be worth considering that
> if too many sever bugs crop up it may be better to request removal.
as yo
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:48:16AM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i recently noticed that the dillo browser has been orphaned by its
> maintainer. As it has quiet a notable user base I would like to prepare
> an QA upload and let my sponsor upload it.
> This mail is to announce my inte
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hello Patrick. When doing a QA upload, is also good to ask oneself this
> question: "could I be intersted in adopting this package?" If you say
> you'll spend a bit of time with dillo, maybe you'd be interested in
> adopting it i
dopting it instead?
Of course, don't feed obliged just because I mentioned, but having a
maintainer is way better than a QA upload. But QA uploads are of course
also welcome!
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
Hi,
i recently noticed that the dillo browser has been orphaned by its
maintainer. As it has quiet a notable user base I would like to prepare
an QA upload and let my sponsor upload it.
This mail is to announce my intension, to avoid duplicated
work. So if anybody is working on this aswell, he sho
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:42:59PM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Don't forget to set maintainer to "Debian QA Packages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
D'oh! I even thought about putting that in before I started writing.
Thanks for reminding me.
> > * After you make your upload, subscribe to the package's
ar maintainer,
> you probably won't understand what's being done as thoroughly as you would
> for your own packages, so ensure you're not subtly breaking something with
> your changes.
[...]
I do not /completely/ agree with that. There is stuff that is imho
completely ok for
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:39:44PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> ---8<-
>
> QA UPLOAD BEST PRACTICES
>
> When making an upload on a package maintained by the QA team, it is
> important to keep some basic points in mind to ensure that these packages
> are kept in good order while they
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:39:44PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
[...]
> ---8<-
>
> QA UPLOAD BEST PRACTICES
>
> When making an upload on a package maintained by the QA team, it is
> important to keep some basic points in mind to ensure that these packages
> are kept in good order
I was just working through QA procedures with my NM applicant, and I
realised that it's not immediately obvious what the standards are for making
a QA upload. A quick flick through the list archives with google didn't
reveal anything particularly enlightening, and none of the links at
qa.debian.or
Hi.
I've prepared QA upload for xmake and dxpc and search sponsors for
them.
They do not fix RC bugs but introduce minor new upstream versions,
set maintainer to QA Group and do some cleanup. dxpc is moved
from non-free to main.
The sources are available from http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian
(or
35 matches
Mail list logo
