Adrian Bunk escribió:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
...
It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
solve every problem.
Automatic tools are inhumen. And the wor
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:53:54PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2004 21:00, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> > > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> > > The Debian-qa and debian devel co
On Saturday 21 February 2004 21:00, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
> > The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
> > upstream version of a software u
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
> upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
> tool and put this info in a
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:20:14AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>...
> > > So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example:
> > >
> > > - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa
> >
> > What are the benefits of spamming Debian QA with hundreds of mails?
>
> To
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 23:54, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
> >...
>
> It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
> solve every problem.
>
I do
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>...
It's a common misunderstanding that automatic tools would be able to
solve every problem.
Automatic tools might help you to identify QA problems, but they are
only
There is a ground problem for begin to work on my proposal and it is
well explained in this post from Filippo Giunchedi on debian QA ml:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/debian-qa-200401/msg00042.html
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 09:29, Matt Bonner ha scritto:
> I think the basic resistance you
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04.12, Bluefuture wrote:
> The problem could be analyzed in this way.
[...]
The open question currently for many people is:
- who implements this piece of software?
- who maintains it?
I propose that you do a quick-and-dirty implementation of it available on some
w
The problem could be analyzed in this way.
There is the Debian Frontier composed by debian-developer/mantainers.
Outside the Debian Frontier there are the freesoftware developers.
Some debian-developer are freesoftware developers and some
debian-freesoftware-developer are at the same time the maint
Il sab, 2004-02-21 alle 00:00, Ben Burton ha scritto:
> > I'm not sure you can say it's always a bug for Debian's package to be
> > out-of-sync with the latest upstream release.
> >
> > For instance, there is a 2.x release of CPAN's HTML::FromText, which is
> > a complete rewrite by a new upstre
> I'm not sure you can say it's always a bug for Debian's package to be
> out-of-sync with the latest upstream release.
>
> For instance, there is a 2.x release of CPAN's HTML::FromText, which is
> a complete rewrite by a new upstream maintainer. However, the new
> maintainer freely admits tha
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
[...]
> So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example:
>
> - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa
> - Defcon 4 Send an automatic email to Debian Qa and open an automatic
> wishlist or minor bug
Il ven, 2004-02-20 alle 23:07, Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
> Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> I think the first action should be a reminder to the maintainer. If
> one has to check the watch page one could just as
On Friday 20 February 2004 23:37, Bluefuture wrote:
> So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example:
>
> - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa
> - Defcon 4 Send an automatic email to Debian Qa and open an automatic
> wishlist or minor bug on the package
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
>
> The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
> upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
> tool and put this info in a db storing relase ve
Bluefuture escribió:
This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
tool and put this info in a db storing relase version, devel/stable
status
This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system:
The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all
upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan
tool and put this info in a db storing relase version, devel/stable
status of the new upstream rel
18 matches
Mail list logo
