On 21/10/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows
> > > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build
> > > failures.
> > O
Colin Watson writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows
> > about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build
> > failures.
>
> OK, acrimony aside, I've downgraded one of ss
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> I can clean out some of the ssh2 stuff, but somebody who actually knows
> about ssh should have a look at the ones that aren't just build
> failures.
OK, acrimony aside, I've downgraded one of ssh2's RC bugs and fixed the
remaining th
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:26:06PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > Are you willing to maintain it,
>
> > > No, since I'm currently happy with the numbe
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
> It might be helpful if there was a "will be removed from the distro in a
> week if not adopted" list as part of wnpp. Some possible rules for sticking
> packages in there could be:
>
> * non-free and orphaned for more than 60 days
> * orphaned for more than 3
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Is that the new way of threading people who speak up against a removal
> > > request for a package?
> > Show me the threat.
> Pardon, telling someone who speaks up against a removal for either
> maintainig the package or at "leas
[Okay, seems like discussions are also not appreciated on this list.
It's sad to see that this list is moving into the same direction of
debian-devel. But since this seems to happen, I'm also now stopping to
post anything here anymore and even reconsider my position about QA.]
On 18/10/01, Colin W
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> * #89881: swi-prolog: bus error during build on sparc
>Package: swi-prolog; Severity: serious; Reported by: Ben Collins
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 214 days old.
> * #99032: can't build on arm
>Package: swi-
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:26:06PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Are you willing to maintain it,
>
> No, since I'm currently happy with the number of packages that I
> maintain. Also I'm tracking the OpenSSH development and so far it worked
> for me, so that I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:26:06PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> No, since I'm currently happy with the number of packages that I
> maintain. Also I'm tracking the OpenSSH development and so far it worked
> for me, so that I don't have a need to use ssh2.
I suggest that the number of people who d
On 18/10/01, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > If I remember correctly, then ssh2 offers some authentication and chroot
> > options, that are not available with OpenSSH. And I'm not sure if all
> > those features will be implemented into OpenS
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> If I remember correctly, then ssh2 offers some authentication and chroot
> options, that are not available with OpenSSH. And I'm not sure if all
> those features will be implemented into OpenSSH too. So therefor I would
> be for keep
On 17/10/01, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
> > * #59031: ssh2: ssh2_2.0.13-5 sshd cannot create .Xauthority
> >Package: ssh2; Severity: grave; Reported by: Ian Eure
> ><[EMAIL P
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> >[RC ssh2 bugs]
>
> And a few more. It's buggy, and real ssh does the job; I'm not aware
> of any compelling justification for it's continued existance. I
> suggest i
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
>
> * #59031: ssh2: ssh2_2.0.13-5 sshd cannot create .Xauthority
>Package: ssh2; Severity: grave; Reported by: Ian Eure
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 1 year and 235 days old.
> Serio
>
> Seems so:
>
> 2.3.2. The maintainer of a package
> --
>
> If the maintainer of a package quits from the Debian project, "Debian
> QA Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> takes over the maintainership of
> the package until someone else volunteers for that
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 07:44:36AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > If you're working on a package whose maintainer is
> > debian-qa@lists.debian.org, please change the maintainer to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it, so that we can eventually
> > look at just the
>
> If you're working on a package whose maintainer is
> debian-qa@lists.debian.org, please change the maintainer to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it, so that we can eventually
> look at just the one list.
>
Has policy been changed as well?
-
We have buried the putrid corpse of Libert
Martin did this a while ago, and I guess it's time to do it again ...
Critical bugs - outstanding
* #104576: dcoppython shadows python-pyqt
Package: dcoppython; Severity: critical; Reported by: Bruce Sass
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: sid; 95 days old.
Grave functionality bugs -
Some open RC bugs...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&archive=no
Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
(A list of all such bugs used to be available).
* #83284: kicq segfaults
Package: kicq; Severity: grave; Reported by: Markus Mohr <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>; 194 days
20 matches
Mail list logo
