Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * request-tracker: Remove from testing and unstable, in keeping with > discussion on this list. (#191165) Any objections? Otherwise I will reassign the ITA #196200 to ftp.debian.org. See also the discussion in this bug. This pa

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-10 13:07]: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > * hostname: Orphan and QA-upload. Check whether Doogie still exists. > > He surely exists... probably doens't care about hostname anymore though, > he mainly works on dp

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-10 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * hostname: Orphan and QA-upload. Check whether Doogie still exists. He surely exists... probably doens't care about hostname anymore though, he mainly works on dpkg (and debbugs?) now. > * php4-apc: Orphan. The maintainer seem

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-05 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:25:38AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Isn't this moot now? Progeny is using anaconda and afaik[1] anaconda uses > > kudzu instead of discover(2). > > debian-installer currently uses discover v1. I was not refering to discover as a program but to "

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-05 Thread Joey Hess
Andreas Metzler wrote: > Isn't this moot now? Progeny is using anaconda and afaik[1] anaconda uses > kudzu instead of discover(2). debian-installer currently uses discover v1. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-05 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 23:20]: > > > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > > p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm > > willing to try and

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-05 Thread Graham Wilson
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * hostname: Orphan and QA-upload. Check whether Doogie still exists. I've talked to Adam and I am taking this. I will make a new upload asap. -- gram signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Progeny said they're going to work on discover2, and Gaudenz Steinlin > has volunteered as well. Ok, fantastic. Are they planning to get it done in time for release, or are some cleanup uploads of the old package necessary? I'm tr

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 23:20]: > > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > > p.s. I don't know how capable I am of taking this package, but I'm > willing to try and adopt it and work on this bug if no one more > qualified steps up Proge

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * discover: Orphan & QA-upload. Its current maintainer(s) are simply not > maintaining it. (#169264) Could this be because they're working on discover2? I thought that discover2 was what d-i was going to be using. - David Nus

Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

2003-12-04 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Of the bugs noted in my RC bug trawl two months ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00037.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2003/debian-qa-200310/msg00038.html Some (many?) are still open and RC on packages in sarge. That was a very conservative RC bug trawl. With