On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 05:52:53PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > These packages are quite important because they describe the
> > > proposed java policy which is some kind of guideline for how
> > > to package java packages. They also provide some dummy pac
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > These packages are quite important because they describe the
> > proposed java policy which is some kind of guideline for how
> > to package java packages. They also provide some dummy packages
>
> The problem is, from what I've read around, that key people d
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:53:34AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[snip]
> I.e. it would be actually easier to go through the normal policy process for
> stuff like this.
Probably yes.
[snip]
> Yep. But since the policy is now ready, and it is not being accepted without
> complains, a
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> First of all it is not a true policy, and should not be seen as
> a such, yet.
Heh, but what the java list people failed to understand is that any
'*policy' WILL be taken as true policy, no matter what you name it, and
therefore if it tries to do somethi
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:30:50PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:35:52PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Well almost the only one on [EMAIL PROTECTED] who did not want the dummy
> > packages is myself. Personaly I have no problem with removing them but
> > lot of other
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:35:52PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Well almost the only one on [EMAIL PROTECTED] who did not want the dummy
> packages is myself. Personaly I have no problem with removing them but
> lot of other people seems to have.
I suggest that you split the dummy packages out so
Hi
Thanks for the reply. I do not take it personal and actually I appriciate
it. :)
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:03:55PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > I have raised this question before, but now I'm a bit frustrated.
>
> I think you will
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I have raised this question before, but now I'm a bit frustrated.
I think you will get a LOT more frustated on this issue. Let me give you a
friendly advice: don't take it personally (it probably isn't, anyway), and
go through the policy procedures or a
Hi
I have raised this question before, but now I'm a bit frustrated.
I want to have contact with a ftp maintainer or some other
person. The thing is that I have two source packages with
multiple binary packages in the incoming directory since
november.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/ftp.debian.org/incomi
9 matches
Mail list logo
