Re: Netmaze: Bug #123741

2002-02-21 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, John Goerzen wrote: > FYI: I uploaded a version of netmaze that fixed this. I had to redefine > some cpp targets that imake used, but it seems to work now. Thanks John! > >> That's because there is no upstream. All changes since 0.81 have been > >> made by me (and I've done

Re: Netmaze: Bug #123741

2002-02-20 Thread John Goerzen
FYI: I uploaded a version of netmaze that fixed this. I had to redefine some cpp targets that imake used, but it seems to work now. -- John On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 05:15 AM, Tille, Andreas wrote: On 1 Feb 2002, John Goerzen wrote: Just s/ComplexProgramTarget/ComplexProgramTargetNo

Re: Netmaze: Bug #123741

2002-02-04 Thread Tille, Andreas
On 1 Feb 2002, John Goerzen wrote: > Just s/ComplexProgramTarget/ComplexProgramTargetNoMan/ does not do the > trick. In fact, it makes things break more. The manual says that it > should only be used in Imakefiles tha tdescribe a single program -- > that is not the case here. Hmm, that's sad. >

Re: Netmaze: Bug #123741

2002-02-01 Thread John Goerzen
"Tille, Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the open bugs of netmaze seem to be easy to fix. At least the RC bug > should be considered to be target to fix soon. Would you care about > it? Should someone step in? Just s/ComplexProgramTarget/ComplexProgramTargetNoMan/ does not do the trick.

Netmaze: Bug #123741

2002-02-01 Thread Tille, Andreas
Hi, the open bugs of netmaze seem to be easy to fix. At least the RC bug should be considered to be target to fix soon. Would you care about it? Should someone step in? Further problem of the package: There is no upstream URL in debian/copyright. A quick search showed at least ftp://sunsite.