On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Simon Kainz wrote:
> My question now is: Should I write a manpage for avr-man stating that this
> is only a wrapper for man
That would be acceptable but I'm not sure how useful it would be.
> man avr-man
>
> would actually execute
>
> man man
That would not be u
Hello!
Trying to write some missing manpages, I found the following
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html lists
avr-man (from package avr-libc) currently without a manpage.
After inspecting avr-man (
http://sources.debian.net/src/avr-libc/1:1.8.0-4/scripts/avr-man.in )
i see that this is esse
Hej,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:38:41 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> IIRC the discussion you've in mind, it was questioning the usefulness
> of man pages specifically for GUI applications.
That is indeed the one I was referring to.
> IIRC, nobody did question
> the usefulness of manpages for C
* Aljoscha Lautenbach [120215 17:46]:
> However, I seem to recall an old discussion on one of the mailing lists about
> the truth of this, because there actually are maintainers (mostly of graphical
> packages) who refuse to accept man-pages for their binaries because they do
> not
> see the poin
hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:46:17PM +0100, Aljoscha Lautenbach wrote [edited]:
[..]
> Obviously I do not want to spend time on something which is not used. I guess
> contacting the maintainer(s) in question beforehand, asking whether
> he/she/they
> would appreciate someone writing a man-page
Re: Dave Harding 2004-08-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In brief, I don't think http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html ,
> which is a listing of missing man pages is acurately reflecting the
> lintian report at:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:08, Dave Harding wrote:
> In brief, I don't think http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html ,
> which is a listing of missing man pages is acurately reflecting the
> lintian report at:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
What does t
Package: qa.debian.org
Greetings,
In brief, I don't think http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html ,
which is a listing of missing man pages is acurately reflecting the
lintian report at:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
Furthermore, the qa.d.o page seems
Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:47:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#154013: qa.debian.org: No auto-update for missing man
pages list
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On 2002-07-23 at 21:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Well, I was going to suggest leaving it open until man-pages.html is a
> little more up to date ... the cause may be different, but the symptom's
> the same. If all else fails we could try something like parsing Contents
> files rather than using
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 09:14:03PM +0100, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> On 2002-07-23 at 20:10 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Actually, it is. It's just that a new lintian report hasn't been
> > generated for some time due to other problems.
>
> OK, sorry. Guess you can close the bug.
Well, I was going
On 2002-07-23 at 20:10 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> > There is a list at
> >
> > http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
> >
> > of Debian packages that are missing manpages. However, this
> > list doesn't seem to be automatically updat
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Andrew Ferrier wrote:
> There is a list at
>
> http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
>
> of Debian packages that are missing manpages. However, this
> list doesn't seem to be automatically updated.
Actually, it is. It's just that a new lintian report hasn'
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-23
Severity: normal
There is a list at
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html
of Debian packages that are missing manpages. However, this
list doesn't seem to be automatically updated. I think this
would be helpful, perhaps once a night or whene
14 matches
Mail list logo
