Re: Maybe remove premail...

2004-06-26 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-24 10:22]: > > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been > > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. > > > > I think you can achieve similar functiona

Re: Maybe remove premail...

2004-06-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-24 10:22]: > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. > > I think you can achieve similar functionality with gnupg and mixmaster. > Maybe we should just r

Re: Maybe remove premail...

2004-06-24 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:08:10AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 02:25]: > > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been > > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. > > > > I think you can achieve simi

Re: Maybe remove premail...

2004-06-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040624 02:25]: > premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been > changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. > > I think you can achieve similar functionality with gnupg and mixmaster. > > Maybe we should just rem

Maybe remove premail...

2004-06-23 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, premail has a few old, functional bugs open. It's in contrib, hasn't been changed since woody released, and I can't find it's upstream. I think you can achieve similar functionality with gnupg and mixmaster. Maybe we should just remove this package? regards Andrew