Roland Mas wrote:
> To make things clear: yes, I have utterly neglected the gforge
> package in the last nine months. That was partly because I spent
> three months traveling, but also because I've been preparing to change
> jobs. The good news is that I should be totally freelance in a bit
> u
Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-05-25 16:12:15 -0400 :
> I think that gforge is a fairly important package, even if it has
> few installations. Isn't gforge running on Alioth? If so, that to
> me is reason enough to keep it in. If Roland needs some help, I can
> probably help out starting in about a m
(Roland, here's the context of my email by the way:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/05/msg00026.html )
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>>* gforge
>>
>>The most commonly installed binary package, gforge-common, has only 12
>>installations (again I bend my rule slightly)
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * gforge
>
> The most commonly installed binary package, gforge-common, has only 12
> installations (again I bend my rule slightly). One of its packages has
> been uninstallable for 64 days. There is also a possible
> security-relat
Dear QA team,
I've made a list of source packages that satisfy the following constraints:
- Fewer than 10 votes in popcon for any binary package generated by it
- Fewer than 10 installations listed by popcon for any binary package
generated by it (I bent this rule a little in a few cases)
- At le
5 matches
Mail list logo
