Re: Limiting piuparts results in DDPO

2014-05-26 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andreas Beckmann 2014-05-26 <53827309.9020...@debian.org> > [ switching to -qa@ and piuparts-devel@ ] > > I think we can assign severities to piuparts problems. for now 2 should > suffice: > * serious, e.g. "modifies/deletes files from an unrelated package" > * important, e.g. "leaves cruft in

Re: Limiting piuparts results in DDPO

2014-05-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
[ switching to -qa@ and piuparts-devel@ ] I think we can assign severities to piuparts problems. for now 2 should suffice: * serious, e.g. "modifies/deletes files from an unrelated package" * important, e.g. "leaves cruft in /var/log/$PACKAGE/ after purge" For stable releases we usually disable t

Re: Limiting piuparts results in DDPO

2014-05-25 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Holger Levsen 2014-05-24 <201405241551.17305.hol...@layer-acht.org> > Hi, > > why is this private between the three of us? Reply to -qa@l.d.o please Cc'ing now. > On Samstag, 24. Mai 2014, Christoph Berg wrote: > > I think the status as shown in DDPO should be more detailed, like the > >

Re: Limiting piuparts results in DDPO

2014-05-24 Thread Dave Steele
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > > ...it will probably make sense to directly show ...S, S2T, T, U, ... results. > (Oldstable plus O2S should probably not appear there at all, as few > people are going to care.) > > Not sure what the best output format is,... Ok, we have