Re: Let's remove ibcs

2005-03-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 279770 ftp.debian.org retitle 279770 RM: ibcs -- RoQA, only works with kernel 2.0/2.2 thanks * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 17:02]: > > > I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: > > > > > > * orphaned (#279770) > > > * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels

Re: Let's remove ibcs

2005-02-16 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:47:34AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: > > > > * orphaned (#279770) > > * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels it seems (linux-a

Re: Let's remove ibcs

2004-11-06 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:47:34AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hi, > > I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: > > * orphaned (#279770) > * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels it seems (linux-abi seems to > replace it for more modern kernels) I agree. By the way, best is IM

Let's remove ibcs

2004-11-06 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: * orphaned (#279770) * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels it seems (linux-abi seems to replace it for more modern kernels) regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to