Re: Let's remove enbd

2005-03-23 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:48:22AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Andrew > > Andrew Pollock wrote: > | retitle 298388 RM: enbd -- orphaned, RC bug, upstream uncontactible > > Isn't that supposed to be RoQA as you are not the maintainer? Or is it

Re: Let's remove enbd

2005-03-23 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew Andrew Pollock wrote: | retitle 298388 RM: enbd -- orphaned, RC bug, upstream uncontactible Isn't that supposed to be RoQA as you are not the maintainer? Or is it RM because the package is orphaned? Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ver

Let's remove enbd

2005-03-22 Thread Andrew Pollock
retitle 298388 RM: enbd -- orphaned, RC bug, upstream uncontactible reassign 298388 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove enbd because: * it has a (questionable) RC bug * the previous maintainer was the upstream author, and that upstream author is now uncontactible (mail bounces, mailb