On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Still discussing how the data should be presented AFAICS. What do the
> lintian maintainers think? Should the links remain as they are and
> point at data for unstable only?
Bart suggested off-list to just keep things as-is for now and deal
with
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Are there any news on the PTS side? DDPO has been fixed already, so to
> my knowledge we are currently just waiting for the PTS.
Still discussing how the data should be presented AFAICS. What do the
lintian maintainers think? Should the lin
On 2012-12-30 04:40, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
>> I propose to extend this file (or alternatively publish a second file
>> with the extensions) to include the version number of the package in
>> question. Currently the format is:
>
>
On 2012-12-30 10:16, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [...]
>
> Given that not all future format changes would have the luck of being
> mechanically distinguishable, it might be a good idea to take this
> chance to add a declared format version, e.g. a first line in
> qa-list.txt starting with "#", dec
On 2012-12-30 09:45, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 07:11:10AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I suggest that we update PTS and DDPO to be ready to process the extended
>> format without functional change first, and then extend qa-list.txt. I'm
>> volunteering to update DD
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:57:57AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 05:41:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > That part is easy but I was not thinking about it, but about how the
> > PTS should present the lintian data.
>
> Well, in general the PTS presents the information a
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 05:41:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> That part is easy but I was not thinking about it, but about how the
> PTS should present the lintian data.
Well, in general the PTS presents the information about the most recent
version of a package, the idea being that the PTS is a ma
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:16:06AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:40:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I do wonder how the PTS should cope with this change though, any
> > thoughts?
>
> Looks like the two formats are easily mechanically distinguishable: the
> new one
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Looks like the two formats are easily mechanically distinguishable: the
That part is easy but I was not thinking about it, but about how the
PTS should present the lintian data.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To U
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:40:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I do wonder how the PTS should cope with this change though, any
> thoughts?
Looks like the two formats are easily mechanically distinguishable: the
new one has one extra field. So a viable migration plan with no down
time is: (1) patch
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 07:11:10AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:09:19PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt"
> > and I propose we extend it to:
> >
> >source source-version E W I P X O
> >
> > In the extended
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:09:19PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for
> consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the
> PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO
> item/column. If
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for
> consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the
> PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO
> item/column. If anyone is aware o
Niels Thykier writes:
> As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for
> consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the
> PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO
> item/column.
The PTS and DDPO is the only user that I'm aware of
Hi,
As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for
consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the
PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO
item/column. If anyone is aware of any other consumers, do let me know
about it (and let th
15 matches
Mail list logo
