On 2004-06-14 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 20:55]:
[...]
> > Not really. The old mysql-library libmysqlclient10 is still used a
> > lot in Debian simply because libmysqlclient12 is licensed under GPL
> > instead LGPL, which makes it imposs
* Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 20:55]:
> On 2004-06-14 Chris Hagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The following maintainers are inactive, or at least aren't
> > maintaining their packages properly. I noticed because the version
> > of python2.3-mysqldb (Hoffleit) is very old and uses
Hi,
Okay, then this would probably be a good candidate for having two packages with
one for that compatibility, like python2.3-mysql3db and python2.3-mysql4db. It
would still be a problematic situation for release if the latter were not
included.
Cheers,
Chris Hagar
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:49
On 2004-06-14 Chris Hagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following maintainers are inactive, or at least aren't
> maintaining their packages properly. I noticed because the version
> of python2.3-mysqldb (Hoffleit) is very old and uses the library for
> the old (3.x) release of mysql, which I thi
Hi,
The following maintainers are inactive, or at least aren't maintaining their
packages properly. I noticed because the version of python2.3-mysqldb
(Hoffleit) is very old and uses the library for the old (3.x) release of mysql,
which I think is probably and unacceptable situation for release
5 matches
Mail list logo
