On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:03:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Andreas,
> I try to create a new watch file for package arb since upstream finally
> started to add proper versions to their releases. Unfortunately they do the
> versioning in the download directory not the tarball.
> [..]
He
Hi,
I try to create a new watch file for package arb since upstream finally started
to add proper versions to their releases. Unfortunately they do the versioning
in the download directory not the tarball. I tried
version=3
http://download.arb-home.de/release/arb_([\d\.]+)/arbsrc.tgz
but this
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> Until uscan gets smarter about cases like these, how about this?
>>
>> version=3
>> http://www.gnumed.de/download/ \
>> http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/[\d\.]+/GNUmed-client\.([\d\.]+)\.tgz
>
>
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like these, how about this?
version=3
http://www.gnumed.de/download/ \
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/[\d\.]+/GNUmed-client\.([\d\.]+)\.tgz
Hmmm, this worked as long as 0.3.10 was the latest version but now
h
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
There doesn't appear to be a bug open about it and IMO such a feature
would probably be useful so I'd suggest filing one.
#516704
Thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Until uscan gets smarter about cases like these, how about this?
>
> Should I file a wishlist bug report about this or is this work in progress
> anyway?
There doesn't appear to be a bug open about it
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
So I wonder whether I missed some trick in my watch file or whether this
should rather be regarded as an uscan bug which should go back to the
directory with the next lower version number and scan the files there.
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So I wonder whether I missed some trick in my watch file or whether this
> should rather be regarded as an uscan bug which should go back to the
> directory with the next lower version number and scan the files there.
Until uscan gets smart
Hi,
DEHS is reporting new versions of GNUmed with the current watch file
which says:
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/([\d\.]+)/GNUmed-client\.(.*)\.tgz
These "new" versions are only release candidates (0.4-rc\d) which should
not be packaged (as I agreed with upstream). So I might live
9 matches
Mail list logo
