Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Just a note to say that I added Andrei Popescu to the unknown-package, as he volunteered to work on bugs filed against unknown packages. Lucas signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 22:02:13, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Yeah, right... any pointers for the mass part? So far I've only picked > > the low hanging fruit (not too many bugs and "packages" familiar to me). > > Unfortunately as the "packag

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Andrei, On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Yeah, right... any pointers for the mass part? So far I've only picked > the low hanging fruit (not too many bugs and "packages" familiar to me). > Unfortunately as the "package" names become too diverse tools like bts > and querybts don

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 11:52:31, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > You do not need to be on the alias to handle these bugs. I was never > there, and still handled quite a few of them. Just filter -bugs-dist@ > mail that have unknown-package in Resent-Cc:, and you're all set. While I'm lucky to have more than a

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 13:28:27, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint= > > wow

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Holger Levsen [2013-05-17 13:19]: > there is also Martin Michlmayr (cc:ed) working on this, see > http://lists.debian.org/20110529101628.ga32...@jirafa.cyrius.com I'm not involved with this anymore. I believe it's handled by Gergely Nagy and Alice Ferrazzi now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://ww

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint= wow, thats still a lng list. I guess at least with those emacs21

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] > > As far as I know they currently go to unknown-package@qa.d.o but I have > > no idea how many persons are behind that a

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Gergely Nagy
Andrei POPESCU writes: >> It's not too significant, but annoying enough to disturb normal -qa@ >> traffic, in my opinion. > > IMVHO getting rid of an alias would be worth it, and it would make a low > entry point for people (like me) who want to contribute. You do not need to be on the alias to

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 08:36:37, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Andrei POPESCU writes: > > >> I also see no reason to significantly increase the traffic on -qa@. :) > > > > Would you know how many mails that is? > > It's about 5-6 misfiled bugs a week on average, but there are times when > it jumps to tens of

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-16 Thread Gergely Nagy
Andrei POPESCU writes: >> I also see no reason to significantly increase the traffic on -qa@. :) > > Would you know how many mails that is? It's about 5-6 misfiled bugs a week on average, but there are times when it jumps to tens of it within a day, then there are quiet times with no such report

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/05/13 at 23:02 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 16 mai 13, 20:24:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > > > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-16 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 20:24:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] > > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?ma

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Hello, > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint= > > I couldn't help noticing there are quite a few new bug

Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages

2013-05-16 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Hello, As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint= I couldn't help noticing there are quite a few new bugs filed against wrong/inexistent packages and should probably be