* John Lightsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040126 10:10]:
> On Monday 26 January 2004 02:35 am, you wrote:
> > * Raphael Goulais ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040125 23:10]:
> > > But it is still a great game.
> > So, should we move it to non-free, or are some thing undistributable
> > at all?
> It's not distr
Le lun 26/01/2004 à 10:15, John Lightsey a écrit :
> It's not distributable. Much of the content is like an xmame rom, the
> upstream author doesn't have a license to use it, but he's not worried
> because there haven't been any complaints.
Agreed. Upstream told me this was not an issue, since
On Monday 26 January 2004 02:35 am, you wrote:
> * Raphael Goulais ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040125 23:10]:
> > > I happen to think this is a great game, but there's no way I'd sign a
> > > rocks-n-diamonds package until the upstream author says it's 100%
> > > clean.
> >
> > I would not even believe in
* Raphael Goulais ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040125 23:10]:
> I would add something about the images. Some of them are from the
> original game, and upstream authors does consider them to be free, as he
> has changed them by modifying their depth level ... So he considers they
> are no longer from the co
Le dim 25/01/2004 à 21:07, John Lightsey a écrit :
> The package is already orphaned and there have been at least three attempts
> at
> adopting it.
I'm one of these three :)
I would add something about the images. Some of them are from the
original game, and upstream authors does consider them
* John Lightsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040125 21:10]:
> The package is already orphaned and there have been at least three attempts at
> adopting it.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=201411
Oh, thanks. Somehow I missed that orphaning.
> The problem is that the ustream author do
On Sunday 25 January 2004 12:26 pm, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
> rocks-n-diamonds is quite a cool tool. However, the version in Debian
> is rather old, and also violates the social contract.
>
> So, how do you plan the future of rocks-n-diamonds? If I can help you,
> please te
Hi,
rocks-n-diamonds is quite a cool tool. However, the version in Debian
is rather old, and also violates the social contract.
So, how do you plan the future of rocks-n-diamonds? If I can help you,
please tell me. I'd like if you can fix these bugs. However, if you'll
not be able to f
8 matches
Mail list logo
