Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
reopen 264172 severity 264172 important thanks On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:40:50AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The problem is that clean doesn't need to be run. Policy says you should > > be be able to build the package by just unpack

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is that clean doesn't need to be run. Policy says you should > be be able to build the package by just unpacking and then running > 'debian/rules binary'. > > Buildd's run clean first, but that isn't required, and a FTBFS when > clea

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:12:41PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > See http://bugs.debian.org/264172. > > > > So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new > > .orig.tar.gz file. > > > > Most people don't

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't believe it is possible to upload a new orig.tar.gz for the same > upstream version of a package. That's a fairly reasonable thing, IMHO -- > you really don't want the source for your package shifting under your > feet... Well, what we need is

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:12:41PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Most people don't see the bug, because we apt-get source as non-root, > > so that tar unpackas without setting the setuid bit, and then the > > package builds witho

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > See http://bugs.debian.org/264172. > > So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new > .orig.tar.gz file. I don't believe it is possible to upload a new orig.tar.gz for the same upstream version of a p

Re: FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-25 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > See http://bugs.debian.org/264172. > > So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new > .orig.tar.gz file. > > Most people don't see the bug, because we apt-get source as non-root, > so that tar unpacka

FTBFS, error in .orig.tar.gz

2004-08-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
See http://bugs.debian.org/264172. So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new .orig.tar.gz file. Most people don't see the bug, because we apt-get source as non-root, so that tar unpackas without setting the setuid bit, and then the package builds without errors. But