Re: Dropping libxml1

2008-04-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2008-04-11, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> >> I've filed a removal bug against koala, but will leave amaterus up to >> the QA group to decide. >> >> Cheers, >> Moritz >> > After some poking around I would vote for removal of amaterus. Maybe

Re: Dropping libxml1

2008-04-11 Thread Barry deFreese
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: I've filed a removal bug against koala, but will leave amaterus up to the QA group to decide. Cheers, Moritz After some poking around I would vote for removal of amaterus. Maybe I'll file a PROP_RM. What about cheops-ng? Looks like it isn't holding up t

Re: Dropping libxml1

2008-04-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080410 23:31]: > > There are only three packages left, which build depend on libxml-dev > > (r-cran-xml and cadaver have only alternate libxml2-dev | libxml-dev > > deps) > > > > cheops-ng (

Re: Dropping libxml1

2008-04-11 Thread Andreas Barth
* Moritz Muehlenhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080410 23:31]: > There are only three packages left, which build depend on libxml-dev > (r-cran-xml and cadaver have only alternate libxml2-dev | libxml-dev > deps) > > cheops-ng (#470011) > -> gnome 1 only, low popcon, last maintainer upload from Feb 2