Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
>>> Y
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:32:57PM +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > * Fix version information
> > * Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
> >for reason independent from their version (e.g. GCC 4.3
> >FTBFS)
> > * Compile a list for the maintainers and the SRM for packag
Le August 15, 2008 10:29:45 am Don Armstrong, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply th
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Supposing your proposal is accepted, would the debbugs teams copy
> the state of the "stable" tag when creating a new "testing" tag? For
> example, would a bug tagged lenny get the tag for Debian 6 when
> adding that tag?
Not automatically, but it's
Le August 15, 2008 10:29:45 am Don Armstrong, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply th
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:48:56PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> >This means that a bug that would normally be buggy in etch and lenny
> >(but fixed in sid) due to the versions present of that package would
> >only be present in lenny if tagged lenny and tagged sid.
>
> Does thi
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
> believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
> work:
>
> * Fix version information
> * Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
>
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *** proposal ***
>
> For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
> limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
> of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package.
>
> This means that a
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>> *** proposal ***
>>
>> For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
>> limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
>> of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
Yes, it does.
It
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
> > > from the bug,
> >
> > Yes, it does.
It
Le August 15, 2008 01:39:23 am Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Le August 14, 2008 11:08:10 pm Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > > Tagging lenny and
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le August 14, 2008 11:08:10 pm Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free from the
> > > bug,
> > Y
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free from the
> > bug,
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> > so this unfortunately wouldn't help the graph. Moreov
Le August 14, 2008 11:08:10 pm Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free from the
> > bug,
>
> Yes, it does.
Why would it?
>
> > so this unfortunately wouldn't help the gr
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free from the bug,
Yes, it does.
> so this unfortunately wouldn't help the graph. Moreover, "suite x" doesn't
> mean anymore that the bug is found in suite x, but "This
Le August 14, 2008 10:08:41 pm Steve Langasek, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
> > believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
> > work:
> >
> > * Fix version informat
Hi
> * Fix version information
> * Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
>for reason independent from their version (e.g. GCC 4.3
>FTBFS)
> * Compile a list for the maintainers and the SRM for packages
>that could need a stable upload.
The security team keeps a file
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
> believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
> work:
> * Fix version information
> * Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
>for rea
Hi.
I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
work:
* Fix version information
* Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
for reason independent from their version (e.g. GCC 4.3
FTBFS)
* Compile a lis
20 matches
Mail list logo
