On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 06:05:43PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >
> > This is another alternative to make things more clear and may be this
> > should be prefered.
>
> Is there a process for making changes to debian/upstream/metadata
> specification at the moment? Let me know if I should go and
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:10:46AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:27:58AM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > The debian/upstream/metadata file spec
> > (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) currently supports
> > a "Repository" field, but does not document
Hi Jelmer,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:27:58AM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> The debian/upstream/metadata file spec
> (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) currently supports
> a "Repository" field, but does not document a way of specifying what
> branch in the repository the upstream sources
The debian/upstream/metadata file spec
(https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) currently supports
a "Repository" field, but does not document a way of specifying what
branch in the repository the upstream sources are in.
This can be necessary when upstream e.g. has multiple release series
and t
4 matches
Mail list logo
