Re: Candidates for oldlibs

On 2004-02-28 Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm suggesting these be moved to oldlibs. > Opinions? Agreement? Disagreement? Have I misunderstood the function of > oldlibs? ;-) [...] > libgnutls5 -- libgnutls7 and libgnutls10 are *both* available now [...] Imho all depending pac

Candidates for oldlibs

I'm suggesting these be moved to oldlibs. Opinions? Agreement? Disagreement? Have I misunderstood the function of oldlibs? ;-) libstdc++3 -- old version of libstdc++-v3, replaced by libstdc++5 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 -- old gcc-2.95 version of libstdc++ libgnutls5 -- libgnutls7 and libgnutls10