Re: Bug#94339: set6x86 does not build from source

2001-04-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hecker wrote: > > > I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86 > > > which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler. > > > Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package? > > > > Richard Hecker <[

Re: Bug#94339: set6x86 does not build from source

2001-04-18 Thread Richard Hecker
Clint Adams wrote: > > > I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86 > > which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler. > > Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package? > > Richard Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may be able t

Re: Bug#94339: set6x86 does not build from source

2001-04-18 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Apr-2001 Colin Watson wrote: > I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86 > which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler. > Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package

Re: Bug#94339: set6x86 does not build from source

2001-04-18 Thread Clint Adams
> I've solved it, but I'm very reluctant to upload a package like set6x86 > which I have no way of testing, especially when I'm poking at assembler. > Does anyone have a Cyrix 6x86 on which they could test my package? Richard Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> may be able to help you out.

Re: Bug#94339: set6x86 does not build from source

2001-04-18 Thread Colin Watson
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Package: set6x86 >Version: 1.5-4 >Severity: serious >X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org > >set6x86 (which is orphaned, but has a wrong maintainer field), does not >build from source: > >cc -O2 -g -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.5\" -o 6x86_reg