Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 02:12:13PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > It has been rejected from wheezy-backports, I've sent a query to the > release team about uploading vpim to wheezy-updates instead: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777047 Note that you can workaround the brokenn

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 20:55, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 19:55, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 03/02/15 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 03/02/15

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 19:55, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Hi Daniel,

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Dani

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > On 30/01/1

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> If my

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> > >> On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ah

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 09:31, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> Is there a DSA contact who looks after ullmann.d.o? > filing DSA tickets is the way to go... > >> Or do you have sudo >> access? I notice nobody replied to the DSA ticket to apt-get inst

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Daniel, On Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Is there a DSA contact who looks after ullmann.d.o? filing DSA tickets is the way to go... > Or do you have sudo > access? I notice nobody replied to the DSA ticket to apt-get install vpim. when did you file this ticket? cheers

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it (...) >>> It seems perfectly reasonable to me

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Daniel, On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > >> If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it > >> (...) > > > > It seems perfectly reasonable to me. I just want to mention that while >

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-01-31 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it >> (...) > > It seems perfectly reasonable to me. I just want to mention that while > we started refactoring DMD in order to provide RSS, YAML and JSON, we > did not

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-01-30 Thread Christophe Siraut
Hi Daniel, > If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it > (...) It seems perfectly reasonable to me. I just want to mention that while we started refactoring DMD in order to provide RSS, YAML and JSON, we did not finish isolating the data from the presentation. In consequ

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-01-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
I had a quick look at what work would be involved to implement this, it doesn't actually appear to be a big task but it would be helpful to get some comment from people already familiar with the UDD strategy If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it: a) make a new class