On 04/13/2012 02:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>
> @ debbugs people: Is there any chance to include in the BTS also
> not-released ports? I mean, I know they technically are not Debian,
> but also non-free is not Debian and it is in the BTS ;) Are there
> reasons to avoid it, or is it technica
[cc-ing debian-debb...@lists.debian.org and debian-...@lists.debian.org]
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:33:09PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Francesca Ciceri dixit:
>
> >> where are we supposed to track bugs against packages in
> >> debian-ports.org’s unreleased suite?
> >
> >Aehm. No idea. I mea
Francesca Ciceri dixit:
>Hey mira :)
;)
>> where are we supposed to track bugs against packages in
>> debian-ports.org’s unreleased suite?
>
>Aehm. No idea. I mean, do you usually use the BTS?
Good question. Strictly speaking, debian-ports.org is not
Debian (no matter whether it’s a package in
[cc-ing debian-qa mailing list: maybe they can help]
@debian-qa people: I'm going through the backlog of "unknow maintainers
/ removed packages" bug reports, and I just closed #660149, as the
package is no longer in Debian.
The problem is the package is still part of the m68k unreleased port.
O
4 matches
Mail list logo
