Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable

2009-12-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
retitle 559863 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources retitle 561568 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources retitle 560352 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources thanks On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > reports 2:2.0.6-4 for unstable. although m

Processed: Re: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable

2009-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 559863 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources Bug #559863 [qa.debian.org] wrongly reports package version in unstable Bug #560352 [qa.debian.org] PTS and DDPO scew-ups Bug #561568 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: wrong aegis ver

Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable

2009-12-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
it seems like this is fixed in some views: http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/ldm.html but still appears in others: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-ltsp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable

2009-12-08 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > The gsynaptics version in unstable is shown wrongly - even older version > than is in oldstable. The package seems to properly exists in unstable > Packages files (at least amd64 which I did check). > > Both following pages show 0.9.7