On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:23:34AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> The problem of this bugs is in ext_watch() (a dehs function) that seem
> doesn't catch watch file in some cases. This function try extract the
> watch file from the diff.gz of the package name submitted.
> The function is quite simple a
The problem of this bugs is in ext_watch() (a dehs function) that seem
doesn't catch watch file in some cases. This function try extract the
watch file from the diff.gz of the package name submitted.
The function is quite simple and seems that doesn't work for package
that already have a watch fil
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:04:55PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> I have upgraded today dehs system to use the last official released
> version of uscan in devscripts package 2.6.10. So it now support the
> same features that uscan 2.6.10
Does this resolve #347624?
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNS
I have upgraded today dehs system to use the last official released
version of uscan in devscripts package 2.6.10. So it now support the
same features that uscan 2.6.10
Cheers,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:28:09PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> At http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=qsf, clicking to
> view the watch file, it shows only this:
>
> version=3
>
> But the watch file has one more line:
>
> version=3
> http://sf.net/qsf/qsf-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was taking a look at my packages on qa.debian.org and I saw that on
the field "Watch Unstable", of the package qsf, there was an "Error Details".
However, that watch file is valid!
$ uscan --verbose
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile
6 matches
Mail list logo
