Re: Bug#107024: marked as done ([patch] osh using strerror)

2001-08-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 08:58:52PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > > >* Removed dependency on base-files (>= 2.1.6) since it's in potato. > > > > That's hardly a reason to remove it; think about the poor people doing > > upgrades from slink... :) > > I thought we only support upgrades from potato.

Re: Bug#107024: marked as done ([patch] osh using strerror)

2001-08-07 Thread Matej Vela
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >* Removed dependency on base-files (>= 2.1.6) since it's in potato. > > That's hardly a reason to remove it; think about the poor people doing > upgrades from slink... :) I thought we only support upgrades from potato. Besides, if I didn't remove it

Re: Bug#107024: marked as done ([patch] osh using strerror)

2001-08-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:33:13PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > osh (1.7-8) unstable; urgency=medium >* Removed dependency on base-files (>= 2.1.6) since it's in potato. That's hardly a reason to remove it; think about the poor people doing upgrades from slink... :) -- Digita

Bug#107024: marked as done ([patch] osh using strerror)

2001-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2001 15:00:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#107024: fixed in osh 1.7-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res