On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:23:39AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> results being sent back to the uploader. This would somehome extend the
> current checks for rejects, but probably more focused on QA rather than
> policy topics.
Very sensible. I could for instance think of "installs files that is
pa
t;>
>> What do you think about this anyway? And who may i prod to get access to
>> packages in the NEW queue? ;-)
>
> You won't get access to the actual packages. That's because the main
> purpose of NEW is to block non-dfsg stuff, which means there ca
o get access to
> packages in the NEW queue? ;-)
You won't get access to the actual packages. That's because the main
purpose of NEW is to block non-dfsg stuff, which means there can be
(and sadly often it's the case) that there might be unredistributable
files (which of course we
Hello,
I believe that the reason there is no access to them is that they have
not yet been verified as DFSG-compliant, so they can't be distributed by
Debian servers.
You'd have to ask the ftp-masters about some kind of exception to this.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
I would like to ask for options/help concerning access to packages in
the new queue: As we are running already lots of automatic testing tools
on various machines, i was thinking about running e.g.
check-all-the-things on packages in the NEW queue, so *before* they
enter the archive?
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
