On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:10:06PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > ... and Request-for-Sponsoring, the pending tag could be extremely useful
> > > for
> > > tracking status of all sponsoring reqs. Every new sponsoree req could
> > > reopen a previous bug and a new sponsor upload could f
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:20:02AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I suggest that you don't waste your time on trying to do this until we
> > implement bug ownership.
>
> Ok, I suppose you'll announce this somewhere.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I suggest that you don't waste your time on trying to do this until we
> implement bug ownership.
Ok, I suppose you'll announce this somewhere.
> ... and Request-for-Sponsoring, the pending tag could be extremely useful for
> trackin
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:55:17AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
> >
> > Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
> >
> > Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:08:34AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 11:05]:
> > I'm still interested and willing to work on it. I had good input on this
> > privately, so i think it's worth of implementing. I'm still on vacation, but
> > i'l
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
>
> Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
>
> Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
> (Co-Maintainer|Help|Whatever)
>
> Unfortunately I haven't had the time yet t
* Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030828 11:05]:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:29:41PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Sounds like a job for WNPP.
> >
> > Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
> >
> > Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
On Saturday 09 August 2003 09:29, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Jul 24 Luca - De Whiskey's - [0.7K] New wnpp tag: Request For
> (Co-Maintainer|Help|Whatever)
>
> Unfortunately I haven't had the time yet to say it's probably a good
> idea, and noone else said anything.
What are the steps required t
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-08 23:46]:
> > someplace where I can find packages for which the maintainer wishes to find
> > co-maintainers ? Would it be worth doing it (I would then volunteer) ?
>
> Sounds like a job for WNPP.
Yeah, in fact this was proposed here before:
Ju
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:17:36AM +0200, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt
> maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found
> this information ... and did not found it.
>
> Some maintainers use the PT
Hi,
Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt
maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found
this information ... and did not found it.
Some maintainers use the PTS to advertise this ... but you have to check the
package on the PTS
11 matches
Mail list logo
