Re: A security-base package for Debian

1999-07-13 Thread Gregory T. Norris
I think that a meta-package would be my preference as well, for essentially the same reasons. On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 10:54:59PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > I think that a meta-package depending on these tools would be useful. > I don't think there is an advantage in combining the source packag

Re: A security-base package for Debian

1999-07-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 10:26:21PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello Maintainers ! > > Brent Fulgham and Martin Schulze suggested to make a debian security > package that contains fakebo, snort[1], tcpdump, sniffit etc. > Conaining means either the packages as IIRC in the net-base package or

Re: A security-base package for Debian

1999-07-13 Thread Martin Schulze
Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello Maintainers ! > > Brent Fulgham and Martin Schulze suggested to make a debian security > package that contains fakebo, snort[1], tcpdump, sniffit etc. > Conaining means either the packages as IIRC in the net-base package or > just making a virtual package that has

A security-base package for Debian

1999-07-12 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Maintainers ! Brent Fulgham and Martin Schulze suggested to make a debian security package that contains fakebo, snort[1], tcpdump, sniffit etc. Conaining means either the packages as IIRC in the net-base package or just making a virtual package that has dependencies to all security related